Eyeworld

OCT 2012

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/87458

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 40 of 168

38 38 EW REFRACTIVE SURGERY October 2012 Deciphering femtosecond-related DLK by Maxine Lipner Senior EyeWorld Contributing Writer How this is affecting laser-cut flaps T he higher the energy set- ting and the larger the flap created with a femtosecond laser, the more likely for diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) to occur, study results pub- lished in the June issue of the Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery sug- gest.1 Yet many of these cases tend to be mild, according to Roni M. Shtein, M.D., assistant professor of ophthalmology, University of Michi- gan, Ann Arbor, who took part in the investigation. Included in the study were 801 eyes that had undergone myopic LASIK with flap creation done by the IntraLase (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, Calif.) 60 KHz femtosec- ond laser. Of these cases, 12.4% went on to develop DLK. Dr. Shtein attributes the relatively high number to how DLK was defined, which in this case included even mild flap in- terface inflammation treated with a routine anti-inflammatory regimen. DLK is typically characterized by a sterile, diffuse white infiltrate seen within the first week after LASIK. While this can be very mild and lo- calized to the interface between the flap and the stroma, on the other end of the spectrum, DLK can result in stromal necrosis and flap melting. Mild transient DLK Mild transient DLK usually resolves easily without any additional inter- able to reach the flap more easily if it's a larger flap," she said. Even given this, large flaps are not neces- sarily something to be avoided. "There are a lot of benefits to having larger flap sizes in terms of optical properties of the surgery," she said. "But it teaches us a little bit more about the pathophysiology of [DLK]." Treatment for femtosecond Cornea with DLK in eye that underwent femtosecond LASIK flap cut Source: Roni M. Shtein, M.D. (from the original JCRS article) vention beyond what is given after LASIK, almost making it unnecessary to call it DLK, according to Dr. Shtein. "We routinely have our LASIK patients on topical steroid eye drops for a week after surgery," she said. "If the inflammation has resolved without any additional steroid, we still record it as DLK because it is inflammation." Dr. Shtein theorizes that damage to the cornea, caused by higher energy settings used to make the flap, may be to blame for DLK here. "There have been some laboratory studies that have shown more in- flammation with higher energy set- tings of the laser," she said. "I think that is probably the case [where] Thin-flap LASIK results in rapid visual recovery T he first study to address when patients feel secure enough to drive or can see well enough to use a cell phone has found visual recovery after myopic thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser usually occurs within the first few hours after surgery. Daniel S. Durrie, M.D., and colleagues at Durrie Vision (Overlook Park, Kan.) prospectively evaluated 20 eyes (10 patients) undergoing thin-flap LASIK (110 ┬Ám) to assess uncor- rected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and monocular contrast sensitivity during the first hours, 1 day, and 1 month post-op. A patient question- naire assessed comfort levels. All eyes had a UDVA of 20/40 at 1 hour and 100% were 20/25 at 4 hours. All patients achieved a binocular UDVA of 20/32 by 30 minutes and 20/20 by 4 hours. Contrast sensitivity dropped in the immediate post- op period, but had recovered to baseline levels by 1 hour, and improved at the 4-hour mark. Functional vision recovery lagged behind visual acuity recovery "by several hours," the authors wrote in the September issue of the Journal of Refractive Surgery. Although 100% of patients (n=8) were at 20/32 or better within 30 minutes of surgery, only one felt comfortable enough to drive; 100% of patients felt comfortable enough to text after 30 minutes. there is collateral damage." This damage may, in fact, be very minor. "There's not a lot with the femtosec- ond, but if you're using higher en- ergy level settings than is necessary, you're probably inciting a little bit of inflammation." In mild transient DLK this may not necessarily be a bad thing. "It may be leading to a stronger healing of the flap," Dr. Shtein said. "So this mild level of DLK, I don't think that I would want to induce it, but I am not too concerned about it." Associated factors When study investigators narrowed down the definition of DLK to those who required additional interven- tion, they discovered more signifi- cant cases. "When we focus on those who were treated with more than standard treatment, who were treated with steroids for longer than 1 week, the rate of DLK was 2 or 3%, which is more consistent with the rates in the literature," Dr. Shtein said. Investigators found that some of the factors that seemed to increase incidence of DLK included a larger flap diameter, higher raster energy, and higher sidecut energy. "We did find that the laser settings correlated so that the more energy we used, the more often we saw inflammation," Dr. Shtein said. "The other finding we saw was that with larger flap di- ameters [there was] more inflamma- tion." Dr. Shtein thinks this goes back to the basic science of where the in- flammation comes from. "It's likely coming from the limbal blood ves- sels, and the inflammatory cells are Reference 1. de Paula FH, Khairallah CG, Niziol LM, et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1009-1014. Editors' note: Dr. Shtein has no finan- cial interests related to this article. Contact information Shtein: 734-763-5506, ronim@med.umich.edu DLK, like with mechanical microker- atomes, centers on steroid anti- inflammatory medication. In mild cases, Dr. Shtein finds that a topical steroid often will suffice. "As it gets more severe, occasionally patients will be treated with oral steroids and frequent topical steroids," she said. "If it gets to a severe enough degree, sometimes the flap is lifted to debulk some of the inflammation by scrapping the bed." Overall, Dr. Shtein sees the study as helping to elucidate how the femtosecond laser is different from the mechanical microkeratome in the response of the cornea. "I think that it highlights the fact that although there is more DLK after femtosecond LASIK, it tends to be very mild and not clinically signifi- cant, and we understand more about what factors we can modify and ma- nipulate to minimize the chance of DLK," she said. "It doesn't necessar- ily mean that we have to modify our technique, but at least we know what factors to take into account." As far as energy settings with the femtosecond laser, Dr. Shtein pointed out that it's a question of weighing key factors. "You don't want to lower your energy settings to the point where it's difficult to lift the flap. You're going to cause more trauma and more damage," she said. "It's a question of finding the balance between these controllable parameters." EW

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - OCT 2012