Eyeworld

MAY 2018

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/978371

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 41 of 86

39 EW REFRACTIVE May 2018 Contact information Chang: dchang@empireeyeandlaser.com Koch: dkoch@bcm.edu Schallhorn: steve.schallhorn@zeiss.com for enhancement. I typically wait at least 3 months to make sure I have a stable refraction before considering an enhancement," he said. Dr. Koch said it is important to explain to patients when they ini- tially present for cataract evaluation that they may need an enhance- ment postoperatively. "However, we also need to explain that there are some small adjustments that could make things worse. If a patient is off by 0.5 D or more, you may or may not want to do something, particularly if it's on the hyperopic side, because the predictability of the procedure might not be as good as you want, and you could make the patient's vision worse. You need to set expectations for the original outcome and for the indications for doing additional steps," he said. Enhancement strategies Dr. Schallhorn's enhancement strategy depends on the patient's refractive error. "If the patient has a significant deviation in his or her refractive error, some type of intraocular procedure might be the best option. For example, if the pa- tient has a toric IOL that is not well aligned and there is visually disturb- ing astigmatism, rotating the toric lens might be the most appropriate procedure. Or if there is a consider- able deviation in the sphere (postop surprise), either exchanging that IOL or a piggyback IOL may be the best option. The best enhancement procedure depends on the residual refractive error," he said. Dr. Koch will use relaxing inci- sions in patients with astigmatism and spherical equivalent within 0.25 D of plano. "Otherwise, I do PRK. LASIK is also great, and patients love the fact that they get their vision back early, but you have be wary of inducing a dry eye," he said. Another option is IOL ex- change. "In my premium patients, I have always been able to address problematic residual refractive errors with corneal procedures, but an IOL exchange may be the best option for anything outside the range of +1 on the hyperopic side and –2 on the myopic side. I will also consider a lens exchange if the patient feels like the wrong lens is in his or her eye. Sometimes it's a psychological issue," Dr. Koch said. EW Editors' note: Dr. Koch has financial in- terests with Alcon (Fort Worth, Texas), Carl Zeiss Meditec (Jena, Germany), Johnson & Johnson Vision (Santa Ana, California), and Perfect Lens (Irvine, California). Dr. Schallhorn and Dr. Chang have financial interests with Carl Zeiss Meditec.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - MAY 2018