EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.
Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/947241
EW CATARACT 75 March 2018 Contact information Cheon: cheoneye@gmail.com a total diameter of 6.0 mm with a convex concave configuration. This IOL is meant for iris fixation and is one size fits all. It is implanted through a small, 3.2 mm incision, which allows controlled folding and unfolding and reduces surgically induced astigmatism (SIA). Other advantages include reversibility of treatment, an aspherical edge design, optimal clearance from vital tissues, a large optical zone, and un- complicated implantation allowing an early return to normal activities. LASEK involved topical anes- thesia, alcohol delamination of the corneal epithelium, the implemen- tation of the Technolas 217P exci- mer laser (Bausch + Lomb, Bridge- water, New Jersey) to carry out ablation, and mitomycin-C 0.02%. LASEK patients have excellent visual outcomes but may require a slightly longer recovery time post-surgery, and the procedure may be associat- ed with HOAs. "In terms of predictability, the two methods show a similar trend over 2 years," Dr. Cheon said. "The Artiflex iris claw lens has the primary advantages of a small main incision, less induced corneal astig- matism, and quicker visual recovery than LASEK. However, the endothe- lial cell density and the morpho- logic picture are better with LASEK, as the phakic IOL implantation saw an increasing cell loss 1 year after surgery, which recovered by 2 years after surgery. We concluded that it had more to do with corneal remodeling than with endothelial cell loss. Based on the 2-year results, Artiflex implantation was preferable to LASEK surgery in high myopic patients, however, in patients with inadequate chamber depth, LASEK can be an acceptable alternative." Some study limitations includ- ed the relatively small sample size and short follow-up period. Short- and long-term complications of intraocular surgical procedures and the risk/benefit balance should be evaluated. Also, patient satisfaction should be considered in all refrac- tive surgical procedures and assessed through a subjective patient ques- tionnaire, particularly with regard to halo, photophobia, and contrast sensitivity, the latter of which is closely related to higher order aber- rations, Dr. Cheon noted. EW Editors' note: Dr. Cheon has no finan- cial interests related to her comments. *Developed In Coordination With Barry S. Seibel, M.D. Background: Botticelli, Madonna of Pomegranate Seibel* Capsulorrhexis Cystotome Forceps ® ABBI 1377 Rev.B Product Number 05-2363 S i d e C lo s ed V i e w T o p D o w n C l o s e d V i e w T o p D ow n Op e n V i e w S i de O p e n V i e w • Viewport Allows Anterior View Through The Tips To See Exactly Where The Jaws Are Grasping. Ideal For Both Capsule & Other Intra-Ocular Manipulation. • Smoothly Etched Markings On Anterior Surface Of Shaft Provide Full & Half Millimeters On Shaft To Help Neutralize Corneal • Mirror Polished Shaft For Maximum Safety. • Low Actuation Handle Pressure For Optimum Ergonomic Dexterity. • Micro-Coaxial Design Ideal For Maintaining Chamber Stability & Visualization In Small Phaco Incisions As Compared To Conventional Forceps. • Made Of Titanium In The USA, Guaranteed For Life, & Available For A 30-Day Surgical Evaluation Without Obligation. 800-225-1195 • info@katena.com • www.katena.com ASCRS Booth # 2828

