Eyeworld

OCT 2017

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/880217

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 115 of 150

113 EW CORNEA October 2017 Contact information Maskin: drmaskin@drmaskin.com Tauber: jt@taubereye.com symptoms only apparent after treat- ment. I have also managed patients with neuropathic dry eye-like pain with MGD who did not have lid tenderness, did have expressible glands but on probing were found to have greater than 92% of glands with occult deep obstruction. Prob- ing helped reverse symptoms. The lesson here is that only probing can establish or confirm a patent duct/ orifice outflow tract with positive physical proof of outflow patency. All patients with MGD should be probed to open and/or maintain a patent outflow tract." Dr. Maskin recommends pa- tients have an annual evaluation as clinical benefits can decline over a year after MGP. Dr. Tauber said he recommends retreatment within the first 8 weeks of the first MGP and follow-up as needed thereafter. EW References 1. Maskin SL, et al. Growth of meibomian gland tissue after intraductal meibomian gland probing in patients with obstructive meibo- mian gland dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 June 7. Epub ahead of print. 2. Maskin SL. Intraductal meibomian gland probing relieves symptoms of obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2010;29:1145–52. 3. Nakayama N, et al. Analysis of meibum before and after intraductal meibomian gland probing in eyes with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2015;34:1206–8. 4. Ma X, et al. Efficacy of intraductal mei- bomian gland probing on tear function in patients with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2016;35:725–30. 5. Sik Sarman Z, et al. Effectiveness of intra- ductal meibomian gland probing for obstruc- tive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2016;35:721–4. 6. Syed ZA, et al. Dynamic intraductal mei- bomian probing: A modified approach to the treatment of obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;33:307–309. 7. Fermon S, et al. Intraductal meibomian gland probing for the treatment of blepharitis. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015;90:76–80. 8. Dongju Q, et al. Clinical research on intraductal meibomian gland probing in the treatment of patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol. 2014;16:615–21. 9. Wladis EJ. Intraductal meibomian gland probing in the management of ocular rosacea. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28:416–8. 10. Cardenas Diaz T, et al. Efficacy of intraductal probing in meibomian gland dysfunction. Revista Cubana de Oftalmologia. 2017;30:1–12. Editors' note: Dr. Maskin has patents on methods and devices for intraductal diagnosis and treatment of MGD. He has financial interests with Rhein Medical. Dr. Tauber has no financial interests related to his comments.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - OCT 2017