Eyeworld

JAN 2016

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/618732

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 33 of 78

EW CATARACT 31 January 2016 (The total is less than 100% due to comments regarding combining multiple methods.) The fifth question was, "What initial incision width, in millimeters, do you use for the phaco procedure?" As you can see, there is a great deal of diversity in methods here. EW Editors' note: Dr. Gossman is in private clinical practice at Eye Surgeons & Physicians, St. Cloud, Minn. He has no financial interests related to this article. Contact information Gossman: n1149x@gmail.com 1.8 3% 2.0 2% 2.2 18% 2.3 1% 2.4 35% 2.5 5% 2.6 5% 2.65 2% 2.7 4% 2.75 9% 2.8 6% 2.85 2% 3.0 1% 3.2 2% Selection of incision size has to do with the particular phaco instru- mentation you have at hand, the minimum incision size compatible with your favored intraocular lens inserter, and your personal feelings as to what is a more "sealable" inci- sion and with minimal influence on astigmatism. I've personally found the 2.2 incision to be a pleasing compromise of all factors and con- tinue to use it after a period of using a 1.8 mm incision proved to result in more difficult-to-seal incisions, no doubt related to wound stretch and small tears during phaco and IOL insertion.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - JAN 2016