Eyeworld

DEC 2015

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/611088

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 17 of 98

EW NEWS & OPINION December 2015 15 New Maskin ® * MGD Products 3360 Scherer Drive, Suite B, St. Petersburg, FL 33716 800-637-4346 • Tel: 727-209-2244 • Fax: 727-341-8123 Email: Info@RheinMedical.com • Website: www.RheinMedical.com *Developed In Coordination With Steven L. Maskin, M.D., Patent Pending PCT/US08/083318, Intraductal Meibomian Gland Probing Relieves Symptoms Of Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Maskin, Steven L, Cornea. 29(10):1145-1152, October 2010. Mantegna, Madonna with Child & Cherubim BCBB 1325 Rev.A 76um Probes 110um Tubes 150um Dilators 150um Tubes Meibum Expressor Call 727-209-2244 For More Information. Testimonial Testimonial diabetic and haven't been in our offices in more than a year," he said. On a grander scale, practices can also use the ASCRS Clinical Survey as an internal benchmarking tool, Mr. Fundingsland said. "Reviewing the survey data—for something like implementation of electronic medical records systems— can help a practice determine if it's ahead of the curve, right on it, or lagging behind," he said. "And that can lead to changing strategies to meet the practice goals." EW Editors' note: Drs. Donnenfeld and Gossman have no financial interests related to this article. Mr. Fundingsland has financial interests with the Fundingsland Group, which supports the administration of the ASCRS Clinical Survey. Contact information Donnenfeld: ericdonnenfeld@gmail.com Fundingsland: brad@tfgeducation.com Gossman: n1149x@gmail.com Survey type Advantages Disadvantages Mail • Easy, cost efficient • No interviewer, respondents may be willing to share information • Response rates typically low • Not appropriate for low literacy audiences • No interviewer, respondents can't be questioned Phone • Large scale accessibility in many countries • Rapid data collection • Quality control • Anonymity • Flexibility • Lack of visual materials • Call screening is common • Limited open- end questions • Wariness • Inattention Online • Low cost • Automation and real-time access • Less time needed • Convenience for respondents • Design flexibility • No interviewer • Limited sampling and respondent availability • Possible cooperation problems • No interviewer In person (face-to- face) • Good response rates • Longer interviews more likely to be tolerated • Attitude can be observed • Expensive • Time-consuming • May produce a non-representative sample Figure 1. Advantages and disadvantages of survey methods Source: Food and Agriculture Organization

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - DEC 2015