Eyeworld

APR 2015

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/493807

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 16 of 86

EW NEWS & OPINION 14 April 2015 Insights by J.C. Noreika, MD, MBA executive vice-president enthusias- tically endorsed prospective global payment models "which promote value over volume." There's that pesky problem of correlation and causation again. In "How Not To Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking," Jordan Ellenberg, professor of math- ematics at the University of Wiscon- sin-Madison, paraphrases Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz by positing "mathematics is the ex- tension of common sense by other means." The math is revealing. Mr. Ellenberg cautions against linear thinking. Ms. Burwell writes, "there were 1.3 million fewer ad- verse events between 2011 and 2013 than there would have been if the rate of such events had remained un- changed" (my italics). Social planners like linear thinking. If policymakers were to treat patients who suddenly lose vision, they might realize that the quality/cost curve is brutally non-linear and "big" is an indepen- dent variable. But non-linearity has its own mysteries. One example is the Laffer curve. Economist Arthur Laffer infamously proposed that the government's tax revenues are non-linearly related to the tax rate. However, when he was questioned by members of Congress in regard to the optimal tax rate, he demurred, "I cannot measure it frankly, but I can tell you what the characteristics of it are." And that's the troubling part about Ms. Burwell's conceit. Confi- dent of design, viz., big and bureau- cratic, the plan lacks insight into the Extending common sense by other means Advancing CATARACT SURGERY LenSx ® © 2015 Novartis 2/15 CNT15013JAD CENTURION ® VISION SYSTEM IMPORTANT PRODUCT INFORMATION CAUTION: Federal (USA) law restricts this device to sale by, or on the order of, a physician. As part of a properly maintained surgical environment, it is recommended that a backup IOL Injector be made available in the event the AutoSert ® IOL Injector Handpiece does not perform as expected. INDICATION: The Centurion ® Vision System is indicated for emulsifi cation, separation, irrigation, and aspiration of cataracts, residual cortical material and lens epithelial cells, vitreous aspiration and cutting associated with anterior vitrectomy, bipolar coagulation, and intraocular lens injection. The AutoSert ® IOL Injector Handpiece is intended to deliver qualifi ed AcrySof ® intraocular lenses into the eye following cataract removal. The AutoSert ® IOL Injector Handpiece achieves the functionality of injection of intraocular lenses. The AutoSert ® IOL Injector Handpiece is indicated for use with the AcrySof ® lenses SN6OWF, SN6AD1, SN6AT3 through SN6AT9, as well as approved AcrySof ® lenses that are specifi cally indicated for use with this inserter, as indicated in the approved labeling of those lenses. WARNINGS: Appropriate use of Centurion ® Vision System parameters and accessories is important for successful procedures. Use of low vacuum limits, low fl ow rates, low bottle heights, high power settings, extended power usage, power usage during occlusion conditions (beeping tones), failure to suffi ciently aspirate viscoelastic prior to using power, excessively tight incisions, and combinations of the above actions may result in signifi cant temperature increases at incision site and inside the eye, and lead to severe thermal eye tissue damage. Good clinical practice dictates the testing for adequate irrigation and aspiration fl ow prior to entering the eye. Ensure that tubings are not occluded or pinched during any phase of operation. The consumables used in conjunction with ALCON ® instrument products constitute a complete surgical system. Use of consumables and handpieces other than those manufactured by Alcon may aff ect system performance and create potential hazards. AES/COMPLICATIONS: Inadvertent actuation of Prime or Tune while a handpiece is in the eye can create a hazardous condition that may result in patient injury. During any ultrasonic procedure, metal particles may result from inadvertent touching of the ultrasonic tip with a second instrument. Another potential source of metal particles resulting from any ultrasonic handpiece may be the result of ultrasonic energy causing micro abrasion of the ultrasonic tip. ATTENTION: Refer to the Directions for Use and Operator's Manual for a complete listing of indications, warnings, cautions and notes. Cautioning against linear thinking T his month's conclave of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery animates ophthal- mology's finest minds to assess the state of their profession. The clairvoyance of Nostradamus, the prophesy of the Cumaean Sibyl, and the mysticism of iridology ar- en't necessary to perceive this year's concerns to be more ACO than PCO, SGR than SLT, medical home than surgery center. Urged on by Congress and the White House, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is resolved to unwind the mainspring of American medicine, fee-for- service payment. In so doing, it threatens to make private practice a retronym like snail-mail and land- line phones. On Jan. 26, HHS Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell announced an ambitious program to tie 50% of Medicare's outlay to alternative payment models by 2018. She proposes to do this by fostering quasi-innovations like accountable care organizations (ACOs), medical home models and bundled payments. In her address to payers, employers, Medicaid directors, consumers, and providers, the argot was familiar: "transfor- mative change," "accountability," "measurable improvement," "man- age and track progress." Quality of care will improve and costs low- ered "by spending our healthcare dollars more wisely." Incentives and penalties prodding physicians to embrace these new programs were not addressed. The process is well underway. Meaningful use, generating "Big Data" by connecting physicians, hospitals, pharmacies, insurers, and patients, is best implemented by large organizations that can absorb its technologic costs by sleight of balance sheet tactics that small prac- tices can't afford. ICD-10 and the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) impose disingenuous taxes best absorbed by not-for-profits. Tort reform's absence in the Affordable Care Act was not solely the slick work of 1-800-lawyers. Unlike other businesses such as financial—and legal—services, these costs cannot be passed along to consumers. Balance billing is proscribed. Government has little use for cottage industries. Only massive, too-big-to-fail organizations pro- vide the efficiencies to preserve the American way of life including its consumption of healthcare. The architects' scatter-plot clearly sug- gests that consolidation inexorably pushes the curve into the coveted quadrant of low cost, high quality care. Hence, the ACO and the medical home. Represented at Burwell's an- nouncement, the American Medi- cal Association endorses a system of high-quality and efficient care "while reducing the administrative and regulatory burdens of physi- cians." How it and the government propose that happens awaits the sequel. Characteristically, the Amer- ican Academy of Family Physicians, the country's fervent admirer of Britain's National Health Service, called for the end of fee-for-service medicine. Quaffing the Kool-Aid, its J.C. Noreika, MD, MBA

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - APR 2015