Eyeworld

MAR 2015

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/474673

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 171 of 234

169 March 2015 EW MEETING REPORTER Meet the ManagementPlus ICD-10 Consultant. On your staff. This year. Keeps your claims cashflow coming in through the coding transition with accurate billing Converts ICD-9 codes or gives step-by-step guidance on coding your Dx Helps your staff transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 ManagementPlus is the fully certified EHR and practice management software suite made from the ground-up for and by ophthalmologists and eye techs since 1995. Learn more about how your practice can thrive with eyecare-specific EHR at managementplus.com, or call 1.800.695.6994. Learn more at managementplus.com/current-events ICD-9 ICD-10 Steady billing cashflow through ICD transition Accurate diagnosis codes Automatic or guided conversions Ophthalmology-specific EHR ICD-10 is coming. Would an ICD-10 consultant help reduce your practice's coding conversion errors & help maintain a steady cash flow this year? Or scan here! ultrasound, the stress on the zonules, and all the ultrasonic ener- gy we use … this is quality care." The topic switched to astigma- tism correction with Dr. Solomon presenting routine and challenging cases of toric IOL implantation. "When planning for astigma- tism correction, not any singular device is going to give you the right answer all the time," he said. "It's helpful to have a couple of different things to look at and make the best judgment." The tools he uses include the Al- con toric calculator, the Barrett toric calculator, the Verion Image Guided System (Alcon), the LENSTAR optical biometer, and the ORA intraopera- tive aberrometer (Alcon). By measuring sphere, cylinder, and axis multiple ways with all of these devices, Dr. Solomon has dramatically improved his toric lens outcomes—89% of his patients with toric lenses are now within a half diopter of emmetropia. Editors' note: Dr. Cionni has financial interests with Alcon and Glaukos. Dr. Donnenfeld has financial interests with Abbott Medical Optics, Alcon, and Bausch + Lomb. Dr. Lane has financial interests with Alcon, Bausch + Lomb, ClarVista, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Rapid Pathogen Screening, TearScience, and VisionCare. Dr. Solomon has financial interests with Alcon. Dr. Weinstock has financial interests with Alcon, Bausch + Lomb, and LENSAR. Legislative and regulatory update Saturday's ASOA practice manage- ment program began with a legis- lative and regulatory update from Nancey McCann, director of gov- ernment relations for ASCRS•ASOA, Fairfax, Va. Ms. McCann highlighted prior- ity issues for ophthalmology, which include enacting the repeal and re- place SGR legislation, rescinding the elimination of 10- and 90-day global periods, the 21st Century Cures Initiative, repealing the IPAB, private contracting/patient shared responsi- bility, the Drug Compounding Law, sterilization of ocular surgical instru- ments, Medicare Advantage Plans, the PQRS/EHR/Value-Based Payment Modifier, ASC quality reporting, and accountable care organizations. SGR was the first topic high- lighted. Over the years, the House and Senate have enacted short-term patches to fix Medicare's SGR, she said. With the last patch, a 24% cut was averted, but this was only for a 12-month period and will only extend through the end of March 2015. This means that without a fix by April 1, there's a possibility of facing a 21% reduction. Congress did not act during the lame duck session, Ms. McCann said, and as of January 2015, the cost of the repeal of SGR is now about $131 billion. The SGR Repeal and Medicare Provider Payment Modernization Act, which will be reintroduced in Congress, would repeal the SGR immediately, and it includes 5 years of a 0.5% update to Medicare physi- cian payments. It also consolidates the 3 existing quality programs (and eliminates all the penalties associ- ated with them) into a new Mer- it-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) that rewards providers who meet performance thresholds and penalizes those who do not. continued on page 172

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - MAR 2015