Eyeworld

References 1. Alcon. Data on fi le. 2020. REF-09123. 2. ARGOS Biometer. User Manual. 2019. 3. ARGOS. User Manual – United States (English). April 1, 2021. 4. Hussaindeen JR, Mariam EG, Arunachalam S, et al. Comparison of axial length using a new swept- source optical coherence tomography-based biometer. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0209356. 5. Multack S, Pan LC, Timmons SK, et al. Impact of a swept-source optical coherence tomography device on effi ciency in cataract evaluation and surgery: A time-and-motion study. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2023;17:1–13. 6. SANTEC Corporation. ARGOS Letter of Declaration: 10× and 100× Sensitivity. 7. Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, et al. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence- length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2016;42:50–61. 8. Shammas HJ, Shammas MC, Jivrajka RV, Cooke DL, Potvin R. Eff ects on IOL power calculation and expected clinical outcomes of axial length measurements based on multiple vs single refractive indices. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020;14:1511–1519. 9. Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new swept-source optical coherence biometer that uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length in cataract patients. Ophthalmic Research. 2019;19:1–13. 10. VERION Reference Unit. User Manual Part I. 2021. 11. Whang W, Yoo Y, Kang M, et al. Predictive accuracy of partial coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography for intraocular lens power calculation. Scientifi c Reports. 2018;8(1):13732. 12. Woodard L, Pan LC, Timmons S, et al. Time effi ciencies associated with an innovative optical biometer in cataract surgery planning: A time-and-motion study. Value in Health. 2020;23(Suppl 2):S739. 13. ZEISS. IOLMaster 700 510(k) Submission. 2015. Please see the equipment product manuals for Important Product Information. * Trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ** Acquisition failure rate of 0% for ARGOS vs 3% IOLMaster 700 (p = 0.05), 5% for Lenstar LS 900 (p = 0.004), and 15% for IOLMaster 500 (p < 0.0001). † Statistically signifi cant diff erences observed versus comparator devices: IOLMaster 700 (p = 0.05), LENSTAR LS 900 (p = 0.004), and IOLMaster 500 (p < 0.0001). †† Axial length acquisition rate compared to IOLMaster 700 (p < 0.0001), IOLMaster 500, and Lenstar LS 900. ‡ Compared to VERION ® Reference Unit. § Higher axial length acquisition rate compared to IOLMaster 700, IOLMaster 500, and LENSTAR LS 900, with improved results when axial length is calculated using multiple segment-specifi c refractive indices. ¶ Average time savings of 30 seconds per patient compared to LENSTAR LS 900, IOLMaster 500, and IOLMaster 700 (p < 0.05). Faster measurements. 5¶ Superior capture rates. 5*† Easier surgical planning. 3-13‡§ © 2026 Alcon Inc. US-ARB-2600001 Complete. Connected. Working as one. Superior Dense Cataract Capture 3,5,7-9**††

• Blank Page
• Blank Page (1)