EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.
Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/1494912
94 | EYEWORLD | APRIL 2023 G UCOMA going to work no matter what, or perhaps the stent isn't in the right spot. "If you're taking a patient in [and doing a MIGS procedure] for drop irritability or compli- ance issues, you should make sure your proce- dure can reduce medication load," Dr. Sheybani said. "I always tell patients that it's a marriage between the medicines and the surgery." Some- times the surgeries can't lower the pressure to what it needs to be, and medicines will get these patients the rest of the way, he said. Dr. Mosaed said that she finds that patients are often still enjoying a pressure reduction years later. "I think patients fall into two broad categories: those in whom it's very minimally effective and doesn't do much for them, and those in whom they get a nice robust pressure response, and in those, it does tend to be sus- tained for many years," she said. Even though you're bypassing the trabec- ular meshwork where you would expect any steroid effect to be playing a role, Dr. Mosaed said there's still a lot of fluctuation in pressure during the early postop period when patients are using steroids and physicians are titrating their glaucoma medications and trying to figure out where they land. "I will give them at least a couple of months to figure out if we need some- thing more," she said, adding that in the rare case that the patient has a sustained IOP spike, she will take them to surgery quickly. When discussing combination MIGS, Dr. Sheybani said two MIGS you often hear being used in combination are the Hydrus and OMNI Surgical System. He said he doesn't usually combine devices though. One reason for this is that he trains fellows, and he needs them to understand what each device does individually. Dr. Mosaed said that she has seen many people use MIGS devices in combination, but she does not. "If you're attempting to do moder- ately effective procedures in combination to try to get the pressure down dramatically, these all add cost and additional unknowns on top of one another," she said. "Most of the MIGS do func- tion through similar methods, like bypassing the trabecular meshwork. If you're doing MIGS that function through different mechanisms of action, combining those might be a better approach." In general, though, Dr. Mosaed said, doing combination MIGS might not make sense "when you do have trabeculectomy that is cheap and effective and when done by the right hands can give excellent results. "Having had so much experience with a wide range of MIGS and long- term results, I'm a believer and it has a place in my armamentarium. However, I still have a deep respect for trabeculectomy and tube shunts," she said. "I think knowing how to do a good trabeculectomy is very much a value, and I don't want MIGS to appear so technically less demanding as to make people lose interest in maintaining trabeculectomy skills." This is key in the training of residents and fellows, Dr. Mosaed said. It's critical to provide solid trabeculectomy training because it's the single most effective IOP-lowering procedure to date. "Many of these training programs are teaching more MIGS, less valveless tubes and even less trabs," she said. "Coming from a place where I've done all of them for 20 years, I can say that they all have their place, but nothing beats a trab." Discussing trabeculectomy, Dr. Sheybani described it as a "powerful surgery," but he said the consequences can be powerful, too. With MIGS, the risk for vision loss related to surgery is lower, but these devices don't lower the pres- sure as much. Much depends on the timeframe and how early you're able to treat the patient. "If we op- erate earlier and can predict who's going to get into trouble sooner, I think these MIGS proce- dures have even more value," he said. Dr. Singh noted the importance of continu- ing to train surgeons on traditional glaucoma procedures even as the MIGS field advances. "I foresee a public health problem in the future if there aren't enough people trained in trabe- culectomy to prevent those who need it from going blind from glaucoma," he said. The field is moving in parallel, he said, with some trying to make traditional surgery better and others trying to refine MIGS to better care for those with mild disease. "To me, those aren't mutually exclusive. You can do both," he said. He also thinks that practitioners who did not receive the necessary training to make trabeculectomy as safe and effective as possible in their practic- es may gravitate to other bleb-forming options. But he agreed with Dr. Mosaed that nothing beats a trabeculectomy when done by the right hands. continued from page 93 Relevant disclosures Mosaed: Alcon, Sight Sciences Sheybani: AbbVie, Alcon, New World Medical, Nova Eye Medical, Santen, Sight Sciences Singh: Alcon, Allergan, Glaukos, Santen, Sight Sciences Contact Mosaed: smosaed@hs.uci.edu Sheybani: arsham.sheybani@gmail.com Singh: kuldev@yahoo.com