Eyeworld

NOV 2018

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/1043093

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 31 of 90

EW CATARACT 29 November 2018 by Maxine Lipner EyeWorld Senior Contributing Writer Often, when practitioners first get started, they erroneously think that they need to make large incisions in order to get any significant dilation, she noted. "But after making 10 to 12 little nicks along the pupillary margin, you would be surprised at how that relaxes the entire pupil and it dilates," she said. "The small- er the incisions are, the better the cosmetic results at the end of the day. Patients end up with a pupil that can sometimes look almost completely normal." Overall, while Malyugin rings and other devices may dominate most phacoemulsification cas- es involving small pupils, in Dr. Goh's view, sphincterotomies are something to keep in mind when these are not available. The sphinc- terotomy technique is preferable to manually stretching the pupil, she stressed. "It maintains a more sustained pupillary dilation intra- operatively," Dr. Goh said, adding that with the manual approach, the pupil dilation only lasts as long as you have the viscoelastic in the eye and tends to come down as soon as the phacoemulsification begins. Complications with the tech- nique tend to resolve. "There was only a trend toward problems like ocular hypertension, uveitis, or mac- ular edema, but it was not statisti- cally significant," Dr. Goh said. It may have been that the under- lying pathology was a risk factor for the complications rather than because of the sphincterotomies, she concluded. EW Reference 1. Goh JWY, et al. Outcomes of sphincteroto- my for small pupil phacoemulsification. Eye (Lond). 2018;32:1334–1337. Editors' note: Dr. Goh has no financial interests related to her comments. Contact information Goh: joanneyau.goh@gmail.com sion in 4% of eyes; a sustained case of this in one eye with pre-existing glaucoma was documented. "Usu- ally it's because they may have had a little more inflammation after the iris has been manipulated, causing the pressure to go up," Dr. Goh said. "But once it has been treated, it resolves itself." Also, 4% of eyes developed transient uveitis. This resolved with topical therapy in all but one case with a history of uveitis, Dr. Goh noted. In addition, CME occurred in 5% of eyes, but all had a history of uveitis, diabetic macular edema, or epiretinal membrane and all ulti- mately resolved back to baseline. Practical pearls Dr. Goh viewed the approach as po- tentially useful for uveitic patients with miotic pupils. "Often they have fibrotic membranes around the pupil, and sometimes stretching the pupil with a Malyugin ring may not achieve adequate dilation," she said. "A Malyugin ring can only get you to a certain point." In using the technique, Dr. Goh advised making small radial incisions rather than large ones. this served as the impetus for the study, Dr. Goh said. Considering complications In this retrospective trial, investi- gators reviewed all of the cases in which the surgeon had performed sphincterotomy in conjunction with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation between March 2012 and February 2017. Included in the study were 114 eyes that had under- gone uncomplicated surgery. Investigators determined that the sphincterotomy technique did not elevate the risk for com- plications. "Patients were not at significantly higher risk of any postoperative problems," Dr. Goh said. "Conversely, they do regain good iris function postoperatively, and aesthetically they constrict to a point where it's cosmetically acceptable." Patients are not left with a permanently dilated pupil after sphincterotomies, she stressed, adding that while the pupil may be slightly larger, it's not something that might cause glare. There were, however, some tran- sient issues, which lasted less than a month, including ocular hyperten- What to expect with the technique P atients who undergo sphincterotomies to ex- pand small pupils during phacoemulsification are not at a higher risk for postoperative complications, according to Joanne WY Goh, MD, Melbourne Comprehensive Eye Surgeons, Bellfield, Australia. While intraoperative pupil dila- tion is frequently done with devices such as the Malyugin ring or pupil hooks, when these are unavailable, sphincterotomy could be a useful option, Dr. Goh noted. "It has been described as an alternative to pupil hooks or Malyugin rings, and we wanted to see how the outcomes compared to these devices and if this was associated with any adverse outcomes," she said. The idea for the retrospective single-surgeon study, 1 published in the journal Eye, arose when a practitioner was describing the sphincterotomy technique to Dr. Goh when she was a fellow at Bris- tol Eye Hospital and was unfamiliar with the approach. This technique involves placing 10–12 small sphincterotomies along the pupil margin, Dr. Goh noted. "What that does is allows the pupil to enlarge and relaxes it because the sphincter muscles have been cut," she said. "If you then inject viscoelastic, the pu- pil will enlarge even further to the point where it's adequate enough for cataract surgery." In such a case, a higher density viscoelastic such as Healon GV (Johnson & Johnson Vi- sion, Santa Ana, California) is used. After discussing this with the surgeon who explained the tech- nique during her fellowship, Dr. Goh inquired about the incidence of postoperative complications with the approach. She wanted to know what the outcomes were and whether this was associated with complications such as postoperative uveitis, raised pressure, or CME. The surgeon was unable to answer, and Expanding phaco pupil horizons with sphincterotomies Research highlight Use of sphincterotomy can be a viable option for pupil expansion during cataract surgery in a case such as this. Source: Boris Malyugin, MD

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - NOV 2018