Eyeworld

OCT 2018

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/1035656

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 65 of 142

63 EW GLAUCOMA October 2018 Contact information Ezzouhairi: ezzouhairis@hotmail.com be repeated if it fails, and is inexpen- sive. "The limitation of cyclodestruc- tion is the location on the ciliary body. In order to focus the energy accurately on the ciliary body, we have to use systematic transillumi- nation. This must be maintained during the whole procedure and the tip placement carefully controlled at each impact. This allows better targeting of the ciliary body, higher efficacy, and less side effects and complications," he explained. In his own experience with transillumination in 168 eyes with refractory glaucoma, Dr. Ezzouhairi applied the transscleral cyclodiode along the entire circumference of the ciliary body avoiding 3 and 9 o'clock as usual in one row in one group and along three parallel rows perpendicular to the circumference in a second group of eyes. The en- ergies used were in a soft mode and without "pop" (1.2 watts maximum for 2 seconds). He found that the second group achieved a better IOP reduction of 57% while the first group achieved 40% IOP reduction. Visual acuity, however, was not significantly different in the two groups. His main complication using cyclodestruction was hypotony of less than 5 mm Hg in both groups, but significantly lower in eyes treat- ed in a three rows mode than those treated in a one row mode. "Hypotony is the main risk factor for cyclodiode therapy. The rate of hypotony is influenced more by higher energy applied at each application than the total energy delivered or the number of applica- tions used. Furthermore, there is a higher risk for hypotony and worse overall outcomes in patients who undergo multiple sessions. It occurs mainly in complicated or complex refractory glaucoma," Dr. Ezzouhairi said. EW References 1. Nassiri N, et al. Ahmed glaucoma valve and single-plate Molteno implants in treatment of refractory glaucoma: a comparative study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:893–902. 2. Sarwat S, et al. Glaucoma drainage devices. American Academy of Ophthalmology. EyeWi- ki. Last updated May 2015. 3. Koh V, et al. Review of the Ahmed versus Baerveldt study–5-year treatment outcomes. Ann Eye Sci. 2017;2:18. Editors' note: Dr. Ezzouhairi has no financial interests related to his comments.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - OCT 2018