Eyeworld

AUG 2018

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/1008383

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 45 of 86

43 EW FEATURE August 2018 • Glaucoma's armamentarium noted that she hasn't used a XEN in a uveitic patient, but she would likely go straight to a tube for these patients. She added that neovascular glaucoma is also a concern. "You don't want hyphemas or fibrin blocking stents like the CyPass or iStent," Dr. Trubnik said, and she thinks the same would be true for the XEN. Dr. Moster said that she still finds trabeculectomy to be the "gold standard" to help bring a patient's pressure down to the low teens or single digits. "There are patients who just need that," she said. Some patients have a lot to lose if the pressure stays up, she said, and it's not unheard of for the pressure to be uncontrolled in the immediate postop period after MIGS. Therefore, trabeculectomies are still Dr. Moster's go-to procedure for the "real deal" glaucoma when pa- tients need a low pressure and have a lot to lose if it's not obtained. MIGS after a failed traditional glaucoma surgery Dr. Moster said she has performed MIGS after a failed traditional glaucoma surgery, specifically using GATT. "I've done GATT after failed trabeculectomies and after failed tubes, however, the trabecular meshwork needs to be visualized for 360 degrees. We can then split the trabecular meshwork in order to lower the pressure by increasing flow into Schlemm's canal," she said. Dr. Moster added that MIGS procedures have broadened the field for juvenile glaucoma, especially GATT. Pressures can drop from 40–50 to 12 and stay there, she said, and this is a tremendous advantage in young people, especially contact lens wearers. Though Dr. Trubnik has not per- formed MIGS after failed traditional glaucoma surgery, she said she has certainly considered it. She has had multiple patients who had a trabeculectomy and tubes and both were not sufficient to control IOP. She's also had patients where the tube eroded once or multiple times. Dr. Trubnik said that in these cases, she wouldn't want to put anymore hardware on the outer surface of the eye but would consid- er doing a CyPass, where everything is internal, and you don't have to worry about the shunt or any mate- rial being exposed. EW Editors' note: Dr. Moster has financial interests with Santen, Alcon, Aller- gan, and Glaukos. Dr. Trubnik has no financial interests related to her comments. Contact information Moster: marlenemoster@gmail.com Trubnik: valerietrubnik@yahoo.com

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - AUG 2018