Eyeworld

FEB 2012

EyeWorld is the official news magazine of the American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Issue link: https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/78719

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 59 of 111

60 EW FEATURE February 2011IOLs February 2012 Determining your surgically induced astigmatism by Michelle Dalton EyeWorld Contributing Editor AT A GLANCE • SIA can be calculated by subtract- ing the pre-op K from the predicted post-op K • Moving incisions to be on axis instead of fixed will reduce SIA • Larger incision sizes create more SIA than smaller incisions • Lower power IOLs create less SIA than higher power IOLs Experts weigh in on how to define, calculate, and minimize SIA I nducing some astigmatism is to be expected during cataract surgery, but with typical cataract incisions becoming smaller and smaller, there may be a time when the discussion is moot. Until then, how surgically in- duced astigmatism (SIA) is caused and how to minimize it remains rel- evant. The increased use of toric IOLs has thrust the entire issue of SIA back into the limelight, experts say. The moment a keratome passes through the cornea, "the astigmatic characteristics of that cornea are dif- ferent," said Warren Hill, M.D., East Valley Ophthalmology, Mesa, Ariz. "We're treating the post-op astigma- tism by doing our best to predict it." Jack Holladay, M.D., clinical professor, Baylor College of Medi- cine (BCM), Houston, said using refraction instead of post-op ker- atometry "can't be done because the crystalline lens could contribute to the pre-op astigmatism." Post-op Ks, however, "are the only measure- ments that tell you what you've done to change the cornea." Operating temporally or superi- orly "will give you very different re- sults," said Douglas D. Koch, M.D., professor and the Allen, Mosbacher, Electronic continued from page 59 out any particular complications. We've learned to be more accepting of advanced technology." EW Editors' note: Drs. Lindstrom and Maxwell are medical consultants for ELENZA. Mr. Mazzocchi has financial interests with ELENZA. Contact information Lindstrom: rllindstrom@mneye.com Maxwell: amaxwellmd@gmail.com Mazzocchi: rudy@elenza.com and Law Chair in ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, BCM, as will scleral vs. corneal incisions. "Scleral incisions are going to be more stable, but certainly very few of us do them. It's why using smaller incisions is so beneficial to minimize SIA," he said. What is SIA? SIA is influenced by the incision's "size, location, corneal radius and corneal thickness, corneal rigidity, and the folded diameter of the lens as it passes through the eye," Dr. Hill said. A 24 D lens inserted through a 2.2 mm incision "will exert a differ- ent influence on the incision than a 10 D lens," he said. "Larger incisions will induce more astigmatism than smaller ones." SIA "is not consistent. Eyes will always heal differently from each other," and that also affects SIA, said Guy Kezirian, M.D., founder, SurgiVision Consultants Inc., Scottsdale, Ariz., an ophthalmic consulting firm. Corneal astigmatism differs from refractive astigmatism, and the "only way" to determine the SIA is "by running cross cylinder solu- tion—what you have pre-op and what you have post-op and the vec- tor difference between the two tells you what your SIA is," Dr. Holladay said, adding the incisional length and incision location will be the two key determinants of SIA. "You'll have more of an effect at 90 degrees than at 180," he said. Moving incisions to be on-axis instead of fixed would help alleviate the majority of the issue, Dr. Kezirian said. Operating on the steep axis "will always cause flattening, which will always reduce the amount of astigmatism a person has," Dr. Holladay said. "You get a bigger ef- fect vertically than horizontally, but you'd still be reducing the astigma- tism if on the steep axis." Dr. Kezirian urges surgeons to adapt incision location to be on axis "because when you have to do a vec- tor addition, you need to know both the amount and the placement of the astigmatism to add it to the pa- tient's corneal astigmatism to de- velop a solution." Calculating your own SIA In the post-LASIK patient, "we can't figure out the true corneal power so it's next to impossible to determine the exact IOL power to place," said Robert Brass, M.D., founder, Brass Eye Center, Latham, N.Y. Using a toric IOL can help address some of About 37% of cataract incisions had a small Descemet's detachment like this one post-op Source: Douglas D. Koch, M.D., and Li Wang, M.D. According to Dr. Kezirian: "Distribution of the Standard Deviations (SD) of the change in keratometric absolute cylinder amounts, by surgeon. Data are from the SurgiVision DataLink IOL Edition software. The graph is based on data from 2,264 eyes from 55 surgeons who had entered 20 eyes or more having both pre-operative and 3-month post-operative keratometry values. The data set excludes eyes that had LRIs or prior surgery. The distribution plots the SD of the absolute change in keratometry cylinder amounts for each surgeon. One SD includes approximately 67% of eyes. "Only 6% of surgeons have SIA values with a standard deviation of 0.1 D or less, and only 37% of surgeons have induced SIA values with standard deviations of 0.30 D or less. The large variation in the induced astigmatism amounts may undermine the value of toric calculators, and speak toward the need for making surgical incisions on-axis or 90 degrees away from the pre-operative cylinder axis location." Source: Guy Kezirian, M.D.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Eyeworld - FEB 2012